VSASCP
Virginia State Association of Skin Care Professionals - www.VSASCP.com
- to be a clearing house of information for the esthetician and the industry
- to represent the voices of the esthetic industry in Virginia
- to protect the scope and practice of Estheticians and Skin Care Professionals in Virginia
- to promote Rigorous Esthetics Standards on a National and International Level
- to promote Standardized Curriculums, Training, Certification and Testing reflective of our industry and technology
- to promote a free exchange of professional knowledge and technological advances in the skin care and antiaging industry demanding standards of quality, and scientific validity for all claims.
Advisory Board Members:
Christine Gordon
Nell Streker
Chris Werne
April Coleman
Jessica Olsen
Laura Todd – Executive Director
Richmond Virginia Local Makes History!
Va Panel Co-Chair appointed by Virginia's Govenor
to serve on the board that regulates Esthetics
Congratulations to Laura Todd!
On July 1, 2005, Governor Warner appointed Laura Todd of The Institute of Advanced Medical Esthetics & co-chair of the Virginia Panel to Virginia's first Four Year Esthetician Seat at the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation .

Above: Laura Todd taking the Oath of Office
Laura Todd was chosen as a subject matter expert to develop the National Exam for Advanced Esthetics and Virginia’s Master Esthetics Exam.
"NEE-O" and Two-Tier Licensure for
Virginians!
Who made HB2510 happen for Virginia?

Above: All wearing pink buttons supplied by the Virginia Panel
"Two-Tier = Safety, support HB2510"
Co Chairs of the Virginia Panel: Laura Todd & Melanie Trainer, Christine Gordon and Melanie Trainer of Graham Web Academy, Members of The Virginia Panel for Esthetics Licensure, Students of Virginia Esthetics Schools, Universal Co. , Members of SVSS and Virginians interested in Esthetics Licensure, Delegate John Welch, III.
the 49th Annual National-Interstate Council of State Boards of Cosmetology
Start the Day out Right.....Breakfast and Lobbying for Two-Tier Licensure in Virginia!

Above: Laura Todd & Delegate OBannon
The 49th Annual National-Interstate Council of State Boards of Cosmetology (NIC) Conference that was held in Richmond, Virginia on August 30th, 2004. Networking with Industry Leaders & State Board Members from all over the United States.
Guest Speakers: June Pendelton, Universal Companies, Catherine Atzen, Laura Todd with Invited Guests.

Spa Day at the General Assembly- January 5th, 2005

Above: Laura Todd and Delegate Welch,
The Patron of House Bill 2510
It was a make shift Day Spa at the General Assembly building in Richmond, Virginia on January 5th, 2005 on the 8th floor. In an effort to educate Delegates and Senators on the Need to Regulate Estheticians, we served over 200 Delegates, Senators, Aides, Secretaries, and visitors through skin analysis and consultations as well as facial treatments. Laura Todd was interview by the Richmond TImes Dispatch and spoke on the need for two tier licensure.
Below: Students from The Institute of Advanced Medical Esthetics and NEE-O Members

authored by Melanie Trainer
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, the Virginia legislature passed a bill that would regulate esthetics and create a two-tiered system of licensure. This new licensure was envisioned as having a basic Esthetics license with 600 hours of training, and a Master's license, with 1200 hours of training. What was unusual about this bill is what little opposition it truly had considering that prior to this new legislation, Virginia was the last State in the nation to regulate esthetics, never mind creating dual licensure.
The history of this Virginia legislation can be traced back to the 2002 legislative session when a bill was proposed to study this issue. The State Board that oversees professional licensure in Virginia, the Board for Professional Occupational Regulation (DPOR), was tasked with writing a study for the Virginia legislature on the need to regulate esthetics, and if they concluded that it did need regulation, how to go about doing so. In November of 2002, DPOR wrote in a lengthy study that "....the Board found convincing evidence to support regulation by mandatory licensure of Esthetics..." and "Public comment supported regulation of esthetics but indicated that several licensure categories may be needed to encompass the different services provided and the training and education required to perform these services...".
With this ammunition in hand, various interest groups formed in Virginia to craft a bill based on the study's recommendations. In the fall of 2004, one of these groups, (name omited), which had been formed for this purpose, splintered when the vast majority of its members that supported two-tier found out that a small faction that supported no Master's license, was going to introduce a bill to this effect. Those that wanted dual-licensure formed their own groups and began working on alternative legislation.
Late in 2004, SVSS worked with the newly formed Virginia Panel for Esthetics Licensure to promote two-tier legislation, co-chaired by Laura Todd of the Institute of Advanced Medical Esthetics, Richmond, VA and Melanie Trainer of Graham Webb Academy, Arlington, VA. A bill was crafted and introduced by our sponsor, Delegate John Welch, III, (R-Virginia Beach). When the 2005 legislative session began in January, Delegate Welch introduced a two-tiered bill that many felt had little chance of passing. In order to increase the chance of passage, the Virginia Panel sponsored a "spa day" for members of the General Assembly and their staff. This spa day was instrumental in educating members on the field of esthetics and promoting awareness of our cause. Universal Companies, a premier distributor and manufacturer of esthetics devices and products, donated gifts for members and staff and State media covered the event. All in all, it was a great success and gave the bill some much needed bolstering.
During the initial House hearings, a small faction of discontented (name omitted) members testified against the bill, citing the lack of precedence for two-tier legislation. The Panel and SVSS were able to counter their arguments, citing the Utah two-tier legislation, and the model of esthetics licensure championed by the National Coalition of Esthetic and Professional Association. In addition, Susanne Warfield of NCEA wrote letters in support of the bill to Delegates, informing them of the issue and discrediting misrepresentations put out by our opposition. Ms. Warfield also sent out blast e-mails to Virginia estheticians and esthetic school's with correct information about the legislation. The bill was reported out favorably and quickly passed the House of Delegates by a wide margin. At this point, the bill headed to the Senate where some difficulties arose.
It quickly became evident that the remnants of (name omited) were going to continue fighting the bill in the Senate, and presented the same information against the Master's portion of the bill at the Senate hearing. Luckily, the Panel and SVSS continued working on educating the Senators and we were able to have the bill reported out favorably of the Senate General Laws Committee, with only two dissenting votes. There were moments of heartburn when a Senate floor amendment was offered that would have had the two newly created esthetics Board seats be paid out of a non-general revenue fund. Technically, this could have delayed implementation of the bill, but the amendment was killed in a conference committee on the closing weekend of the General Assembly, thus paving the way for final passage.
Many lessons were learned from the successful passage of this bill. One, Virginia was ready for licensure and the two groups that worked with the appropriate State agencies were successful in ultimately gaining those agencies's support. Second, we were lucky in that groups that could have been opposed to our bill (i.e. the Medical Society of Virginia, massage therapists, Career College Association) worked with us to clarify any of their issues, and they in turn came out in support of our bill. Third, our opposition worked so hard on killing the Master's portion of our bill, issues such as creating two new board positions never became controversial. Fourth, having more than one group supporting a bill and working with other groups showed unity and strength to members of the General Assembly. Fifth, working to educate members as to how esthetic procedures can be complicated and those performing those services (i.e. microdermabrasion and chemical peels in particular) needed to be properly trained. We had pictures of chemical peels performed by untrained personnel and some of their horrifying effects. These pictures themselves persuaded many members who are against any type of regulation to strongly support our bill. Sixth, it was important to remember that those of us working on this issue needed to present a united front and get this important legislation passed. It was unimportant who ultimately gets the credit. And lastly, it is vital that anyone looking to pass legislation find a legislator that is willing to go to bat for you and make sure that everyone stays well informed on any issues that may arise. We in Virginia were lucky that Delegate John Welch was our bill's sponsor. He and his chief of staff worked to ensure victory for Virginia and it's estheticians.
As we go forward now with our new legislation, it will be important to remain united behind implementation of a successful two-tiered system. We will continue to work with our State agency's to hopefully ensure that the curriculum is correct and that the appropriate modalities go into both the first-tier Basic Esthetics license (600 hours) and the second-tier (1200 hours) or Master's Esthetics license. With many States looking to add hours to their esthetics license, we strongly recommend that they consider the dual-tier approach.
Read how this aids the consumer
Wondering how this new law will impact you?
CHAPTER 829
An Act to amend and reenact 54.1-700 through 54.1-703 and 54.1-704.1 through 54.1-706 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 54.1-703.3, relating to the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation; Board for Barbers and Cosmetology; regulation of estheticians.[H 2510] Approved March 26, 2005 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:1. That 54.1-700 through 54.1-703 and 54.1-704.1 through 54.1-706 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding a section numbered 54.1-703.3 as follows: 54.1-700. Definitions.As used in this chapter, unless the context requires a different meaning:"Esthetician" means a person who engages in the practice of esthetics for compensation."Esthetics" includes, but is not limited to, the following practices of administering cosmetic treatments to enhance or improve the appearance of the skin: cleansing, toning, performing effleurage or other related movements, stimulating, exfoliating, or performing any other similar procedure on the skin of the human body or scalp by means of cosmetic preparations, treatments, any nonlaser device, electrical, mechanical, or manual, for care of the skin; applying make-up or eyelashes to any person, tinting or perming eyelashes and eyebrows, and lightening hair on the body except the scalp; and removing unwanted hair from the body of any person by the use of tweezing, chemical, or mechanical means. However, "esthetics" is not a healing art and shall not include any practice, activity, or treatment that constitutes the practice of medicine, osteopathic medicine, or chiropractic. The terms "healing arts," "practice of medicine," "practice of osteopathic medicine," and "practice of chiropractic" shall mean the same as those terms are defined in 54.1-2900."Esthetics instructor" means a licensed esthetician who has been certified by the Board as having completed an approved curriculum and who meets the competency standards of the Board as an instructor of esthetics."Esthetics spa" means any commercial establishment, residence, vehicle, or other establishment, place, or event wherein esthetics is offered or practiced on a regular basis for compensation under regulations of the Board. "Master esthetician" means a licensed esthetician who, in addition to the practice of esthetics, offers to the public for compensation, without the use of laser technology, lymphatic drainage, chemical exfoliation, or microdermabrasion, and who has met such additional requirements as determined by the Board to practice lymphatic drainage, chemical exfoliation with products other than Schedules II through VI controlled substances as defined in the Drug Control Act (54.1-3400 et seq.), and microdermabrasion of the epidermis."School of esthetics" means a place or establishment licensed by the Board to accept and train students and which offers an esthetics curriculum approved by the Board.
© LAT inc. 2008
All portions and the contents of this webpage, courses and programs are copyright property of
The Institute of Advanced Medical Esthetics and can not be copied, distributed or modified in
form. Entry into courses and this website constitute your acknowledgment of this agreement.


